D.A. Rosen disqualified from prosecuting defendant in donations-for-gun-permits case

Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen discusses charges in the donations-for-gun-permits case outside his office in San Jose in November 2020. Photo by Jana Kadah of the Bay City News Foundation.

By the Daily Post staff

A state appeals court on Friday ruled that District Attorney Jeff Rosen and his office should be disqualified from prosecuting one of the defendants charged in a scheme alleging Sheriff Laurie Smith’s associates exchanged gun permits for campaign donations.

Sixth District Court of Appeals Associate Justice Adrienne Grover said that if the prosecution of Christopher Schumb is to continue, it should be handled by the state Attorney General’s office.

Schumb, a San Jose attorney, has a history of fundraising for elected officials and in this case accepted donations from those seeking gun permits in his capacity as a treasurer of an independent expenditure committee supporting Sheriff Smith’s re-election in 2018.

Schumb argued that his friendship with both Rosen and Rosen’s chief assistant, Jay Boyarsky, created a conflict of interest, making it unlikely Schumb would receive a fair trial.

Rosen said in a declaration that after he was elected district attorney in 2010, Schumb “became a political supporter, helped raise money for my subsequent re-election campaigns, and gave me political advice.”

Schumb asked the appeals court if jurors might think Rosen decided to prosecute him so that it wouldn’t look like then D.A. was playing favorites and shielding a friend.

Schumb also pointed out that Rosen’s own office policy prohibited prosecutors in his office from handling the case of a friend or relative.

A trial court judge, Eric Geffon, threw out Schumb’s request to disqualify Rosen in September 2020. But Schumb appealed, and on Friday the appeals court came down on Schumb’s side.

In court documents, Schumb’s lawyer said the case all about tit-for-tat: that Rosen decided to investigate Sheriff Smith in retaliation for her refusal to let the DA secretly wiretap inmates in her jail. She said he needed a warrant. Rosen claimed he had been investigating Smith long before her decision to deny his wiretaps.

Schumb said in a declaration that Boyarsky had sought his help to mediate the dispute between Rosen and Smith.

Rosen was unsuccessful in obtaining access to the phone calls. Then the D.A. had his investigators raid Smith’s offices.

The D.A. brought charges against 10 people including Schumb over allegations that sheriff’s office personnel those involved in Smith’s re-election exchanged hard-to-get carry concealed weapon (CCW) permits in exchange for campaign contributions.

Smith, who was first elected in 1998 and is in her sixth term, had been accused of selling such permits by opponents in previous re-election campaigns, but this was the first time a district attorney decided to bring charges.

Schumb is charged with bribery and conspiracy to commit bribery.

Also charged are Sheriff’s Capt. James Jensen, Undersheriff Rick Sung, Apple security chief Thomas Moyer, attorney Harpaul Nahal, insurance broker Harpreet Chadha and local gun parts manufacturer Michael Nichols.

Jensen also asked the appeals court to disqualify Rosen in his case, but that was denied on Friday.

The former CEO of AS Solution Inc., Christian West, pleaded guilty on Aug. 31, 2020, to charges that he offered $90,000 to Smith’s re-election campaign in exchange for CCW permits.

AS Solution provides security to Facebook’s top executives.

West’s charges will be reduced to misdemeanors if he testifies for the D.A., which is expected.

Two other former employees of AS Solution, Martin Nielsen and Jack Stromgren, pleaded guilty on Oct. 19, 2020, to misdemeanor charges in the case and will testify against the other defendants.

Previous Post stories on the gun permit scandal

• Aug. 7, 2020 — Sheriff’s captain, 2 lawyers, businessman indicted by grand jury in alleged gun permit scheme

• Aug. 28, 2020 — CEO of security firm indicted in sheriff’s office gun-permit scandal

• Aug. 31, 2020 — One defendant in gun-permit case pleads guilty, another wants DA removed

• Sept. 19, 2020 — Judge rejects attempt to have DA Rosen kicked off of gun permit case

• Oct. 19, 2020 — Two more plead guilty in alleged gun permit scheme

• Nov. 20, 2020 — Undersheriff Rick Sung indicted in gun permit probe

• Nov. 23, 2020 — Apple security chief indicted in growing bribes-for-gun-permits scandal



  1. Interesting how Laurie Smith is supposedly the ring-leader, but the DA hasn’t charged her. If I’m a juror in the trial of one of these guys, I’d have reasonable doubt about the charges if they supposedly stem from her, but she’s not indicted.

  2. Rosen rarely charges cops who kill or beat people. But if a cop won’t let him wiretap somebody illegally, he becomes a justice crusader and summons the courage to file charges against cops. Interesting how his morals change from case to case.

  3. Neither Smith nor Rosen will have jobs two years from now. Smith will be 70 when her current term is up and won’t run for a 7th term. Rosen’s up at the same time and public defender Sajid Khan should have no problem knocking him off. Rosen’s record is atrocious.

  4. Rosen is afraid of Sajid Khan. When Khan spoke in support of the protests stemming from the George Floyd murder, Rosen said Khan was trying to incite violence. Rosen’s response was over the top. He retaliated by calling Khan’s boss and trying to initiate a legal process that would result in Khan’s firing. But it’s what you would expect from a white racist who is trying to desperately defend the system.

Comments are closed.