Local heart doctor indicted on sex charge

Dr. John Giacomini. Stanford photo.

Daily Post Staff Writer

A federal grand jury has indicted a former top heart doctor at the Palo Alto VA Hospital and Stanford on a charge of abusive sexual contact involving another doctor.

Dr. John Giacomini, 71, of Atherton, is accused of subjecting the other doctor, his subordinate, to unwanted and nonconsensual sexual contact on Dec. 20, 2017.

Attorney Anthony Brass of San Francisco, who is representing Giacomini, declined comment today.

In October, the Post wrote about Giacomini’s termination from the VA, where he was chief of cardiology, and Stanford University, where he was a professor of cardiology. At the time his lawyer said Giacomini’s relationship with the other doctor was consensual.

After he was let go by Stanford and the VA, Giacomini became an administrative consultant at Sequoia Hospital in Redwood City.

Since the alleged sexual battery allegedly happened on federal property, the VA referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for federal prosecution.

Giacomini is currently free on a $200,000 bond. He made a court appearance by phone today and his next court date is for July 7. He faces a maximum of two years in prison and a $250,000 fine if found guilty.

Details of VA investigation

The Post in August filed a Freedom of Information Request with the Department of Veterans Affairs for a Nov. 15, 2018, memo that described the VA’s investigation into Giacomini.

The memo, authored by Jonathan Sills of the VA’s Administrative Board of Investigation, found that Giacomini engaged in “behaviors of a sexual nature” with a subordinate employee after she told him she did not want a relationship beyond being friends.

The VA determined that Giacomini engaged in “a prohibited relationship with a subordinate” and created an “intimidating, hostile and offensive work environment,” according to the memo.

The memo says that a female employee being supervised by Giacomini reported that he began giving her hugs when leaving her office during the fall of 2017.
He expanded that behavior to rubbing her back and kissing her neck, the memo says. She told him that she did not want a relationship with him because he was her boss, to which he responded that he was “more of a colleague,” according to the allegations outlined in the memo.

Aggressive sexual pursuit alleged

The employee reported that over the next few months Giacomini grew more aggressive in his pursuit of a sexual relationship, according to the memo. He began touching her breasts and buttocks and holding her jaw when kissing her, the memo says. He also hugged her on various occasions in a position such that her hands would be held against genitals, according to the memo.

On one occasion Giacomini undid the drawstrings of the employee’s scrubs and put his hands under her underwear, according to the memo. A VA housekeeper witnessed that encounter when the housekeeper opened the door to the office that Giacomini and the employee were inside, according to the memo.

The investigation said the employee reported feeling harassed while Giacomini described their interactions as being consensual, according to the memo.
Evidence collected during the investigation indicated that Giacomini had “engaged in behaviors of a sexual nature” with the employee after she advised him that she did not want to have a relationship beyond being friends, according to the memo.

The investigation also found evidence that indicated Giacomini likely propositioned a second female subordinate to engage in a sexual relationship, and continued to ask for hugs and make inappropriate comments about her appearance that were sexual in nature after she declined.

The memo says that employee alleged Giacomini asked her to have a relationship with him in 2008 while attending an off-site conference. She rebuffed him, but he continued to make comments about her appearance including mentioning that she had lost weight in her chest or that a faculty meeting was boring but at least he was able to see her “in her jeans,” the memo says.

She said she did not report him at the time because she believed he was going to retaliate against her and he was her supervisor, according to the memo.

Giacomini’s attorney responds

His lawyer, Michael Betz, said in a statement that Giacomini adamantly denies any allegations of workplace impropriety.

“In regards to confidential investigations concerning a consensual relationship, which had nothing to do with the practice of medicine, we maintain they were improperly conducted and contain defamatory statements about Dr. Giacomini,” said Betz.

When the Post inquired about Giacomini’s employment status in August, Stanford said he was terminated after it conducted an investigation.

“Upon learning of the complaint against Dr. Giacomini in June of 2018, Stanford placed him on leave and relieved him of any responsibilities at the university,” said Stanford spokeswoman Julie Greicius. “As a result of the investigation’s findings, Dr. Giacomini was given the notice necessary to terminate his contract. During that period, he chose to retire. Dr. Giacomini did not resume any of his responsibilities at Stanford after being placed on leave in June 2018, and is no longer a Stanford faculty member.”

The VA confirmed in August that Giacomini was no longer an employee, but declined to comment on the details of his departure.


  1. Wow, talk about white privilege. Giacomini would’ve never picked up another job had he been a person of color. [Removed — Don’t accuse people of crimes they haven’t been charged with.] Giacomini would have been better off hanging out with Mateo County Sheriff Bolanos at the Las Vegas Brothel.

  2. Why didn’t he just find someone he didn’t work with who is willing to have an affair? There are plenty of women out there who would hookup with an M.D. Maybe it’s more convenient during work hours. Sounds like the woman gave him plenty of chances before blowing the whistle. I hope it’s not a crazy woman who is lying. How do they prove anything? Cameras? There is no blue dress. Sad for his wife and family, either way.

Comments are closed.