Townhouse development approved but tenants facing eviction will need to be relocated

A new townhouse development on Rock Street that was approved by Mountain View City Council. Illustration provided by the developer, Dividend Homes.

Daily Post Staff Writer

A compromise reached just after the stroke of midnight this morning (Dec. 12) will allow the construction of 15 townhouses in Mountain View on a site where 75 people now live in rent-controlled apartments.

Mountain View City Council, during a four-hour hearing, was split over whether to approve the development that would result in townhouses selling for $1.3 million at 2005 Rock St., a block from the corner of Rengstorff Avenue and W. Middlefield Road.

Council members Ken Rosenberg, Lenny Siegel and Pat Showalter voted against the project, while Chris Clark, Margaret Abe-Koga, Lisa Matichak and John McAlister favored it.

Tenants to move

Clark was the swing vote. He decided to support the project after the developer, Morgan Hill-based Dividend Homes, agreed to keep the existing apartments open until Dec. 31, 2019, and relocate the residents to either some place in Mountain View, or if necessary, as far away as San Jose or Redwood City.

An aerial view of the townhouse development site.

Most of the families living there now pay about $2,000 a month, according to attorney Nazanin Salehi, who represents the tenants.

Of the 75 residents, 30 are children, Salehi said. The adults hold working-class jobs, ranging from receptionist to janitor, from housekeeper to Google cafeteria worker.

Showalter, Siegel and Rosenberg all said they didn’t want a project displacing working-class residents, whom they called the “backbone” of the city.
Those in favor pointed out that the council has previously approved similar projects, where apartments are torn down in order for other types of developments to be built.

‘Good for the community?’

But Siegel countered that with the previous approvals, there was not a huge outpouring of concern from residents who would lose their homes, like there was this time.

“As a council member, I think the first question to ask about a project is ‘Is this project good for your community?’” said Showalter. “I think most of you would say that there isn’t a housing project that Pat Showalter doesn’t like. Well the thing is, this is one.”


  1. This was not a compromise. It was a decision to continue the legacy in this country that favors wealthy white land ownership over the lives of people of color. This was a vote to continue the gentrification that the wealthy residents on the Peninsula (and investors who don’t live here) favor and then the City Councils carry out in order to displace people of color. Shame on Mountain View Council members Chris Clark, Margaret Abe-Koga, Lisa Matichak and John McAlister for upholding economic systems of white supremacy and not upholding the diversity of Mountain View.

  2. @racial, are you saying that the owner of a property shouldn’t be free to do what he wants with the property? Are the tenants to be given new rights to stay beyond the end of their leases? Do you believe in property rights? Or are you extending rights to tenants that they don’t have under the law?

Comments are closed.