Mistake by city imperils plans for new home

The home proposed for 702 Ellsworth Place in Palo Alto. Illustration by Hayes Architects.

BY BRADEN CARTWRIGHT
Daily Post Staff Writer

A mistake made by city planners long ago came back to haunt Palo Alto City Council tonight (March 13) as they grappled with whether to allow a new house near the Winter Lodge that the buyer was told he could build, but neighbors have organized against.

The property in question at 702 Ellsworth Place was approved in 1967 as a parking lot for an apartment complex next door at 2901 Middlefield Road, which stands today.

But planners never recorded the new zoning for 702 Ellsworth Place, and Richard Dewey sold it to Nitin Handa in 2017 for just $950,000.

Before the deal closed, city planners told Handa that he could build a house on the property. But when Handa turned in his application for a one-story house, planners said the zoning map was never updated and he had to go to council to get the 1967 rules changed.

The discrepancy between the zoning map and the zoning approved in 1967 was called out by neighbors on Ellsworth Place, who said that replacing the parking lot with a house would impact deliveries, parking and safety on their street, which is only 20 feet wide. They sent the city 57 pages of letters detailing their concerns and were organized during public comment tonight.

The meeting was a “pre-screening” for council members to give feedback before deciding whether to change the zoning, so they didn’t take a vote. But their comments showed where they stood.

Councilwoman Julie Lythcott-Haims said that the city’s zoning rules are “arbitrary choices of humans — designed to control how we live, and who could live where.”

Lythcott-Haims: Land was stolen

“I want to remind us that land ownership in this country was a concept created by humans who stole land from other humans, and then those humans sold that land to others who sold it to others. And then at some point, those others created arbitrary rules about what could and could not be done,” she said.

Lythcott-Haims said she is just as interested in asking the Muwekma Ohlone what they thought of the problem as she is in asking the Palo Alto City Council Council of 1967,  the same year she was born.
Another house could actually make the road safer by signaling to drivers that there are homes and driveways here, Lythcott-Haims said.

Mayor Lydia Kou, who is a realtor, said Handa should’ve done more investigating before he bought the property.

“I heavily advise my clients to perform due diligence when they’re purchasing a property,” she said. “In this instance, I am surprised by the lack of due diligence.”

But Handa would’ve had to look through old council minutes to know the proper zoning, Planning Director Jonathan Lait said.

Even city planners may mistakenly have allowed some heritage oak trees to be cut down in 2018 because they didn’t know the zoning, Chief Planning Official Amy French said.

Kou then questioned how one parcel, the parking lot, could be sold off since it was part of a larger council-approved apartment complex. 

Allowing a zoning change here would have implications for many council-approved projects, Kou said.

Safety concerns

Vice Mayor Greer Stone said he drives by Ellsworth Place almost every day and sees how dangerous the area is. If council is weighing property rights of one homeowner versus the safety of neighbors and drivers, then safety wins, Stone said.

Councilman Ed Lauing said the city has a bigger problem on Middlefield Road with access and safety.

“That, one way or another, has to get addressed,” he said.

Councilman Pat Burt suggested a two-story house with a smaller footprint to ease concerns from neighbors about crowding their road.

Councilman Greg Tanaka and Councilwoman Vicki Veenker said they agreed with Burt’s idea, and they wanted the neighbors and the property owner to come back with a solution that was agreeable for everyone.

12 Comments

  1. One of our council members is insane. I quote from the story:

    “I want to remind us that land ownership in this country was a concept created by humans who stole land from other humans, and then those humans sold that land to others who sold it to others. And then at some point, those others created arbitrary rules about what could and could not be done,” she said.

    Lythcott-Haims said she is just as interested in asking the Muwekma Ohlone what they thought of the problem as she is in asking the Palo Alto City Council Council of 1967, the same year she was born.

      • I apologize to Awdry in advance, but you’ve got a lot to learn about gas stoves, Hatt. They are silly things and must be kept in their place. After pushing them about here for a few weeks, you’ll know almost as much about them as Palo Alto.

  2. I think every fast foot restaurant should build an outlet in front of Julie’s new house if zoning is so arbitrary. Fair’s fair.

    Sp0eaking of arbitrary, she criticized her neighbors as racist about their treatment of her when she was building her house. She was so adamant it felt like the lady do protest too much. Her house looks like Attica and is totally out of character for her =neighborhood.

  3. Julie Lythcott-Haims is a socialist who won’t rest until she has taken away the private property of those she sees as “privileged” and given it to her buddies. Her arguments aren’t really solid, so she jumps to “racism” when she’s about to lose. In the past, whites would stop arguing with a person when they pull the race card. But now the race card is used so often that nobody cares, they know it’s fake.

  4. “Before the deal closed, city planners told Handa that he could build a house on the property” – is there any sort of record of this? There’s no mention of the Planning Dept questioning the validity of the statement. If this mistake happened as described, why can’t the owner rely on what the Planning Dept. said? Is the Hotel President a precedent for such reliance? If I am remembering correctly, the new owners of the President were told by the Planning Dept. and former City Manager that they could “by right” pursue their development plans. Turned out there was a typo that favored the developer. That’s not exactly a surprise in Palo Alto, but in a city where land is extremely valuable, it seems to me that what happened w/the President matter confirmed that property owners, buyers, and sellers should be able to rely on what they are told by the Planning Department. So that department needs to get things right and not make errors that cost people a lot of money or the loss of housing..

Comments are closed.