The former owner of the First Republic Bank building at 2100 El Camino Real in Palo Alto paid $226,803 in fines to the city for not having a grocery store at the College Terrace neighborhood building, according to City Attorney Molly Stump.
Stump told the Post in an email that the city fined AGB-PACT …
Premium Content: To read the rest of this article, please click here and Sign In or Subscribe to access our paid site.
If you have a Daily Post Archives account, your access includes Premium Content such as this article. Enter your Archives Username and Password, and you will be redirected to the article.
If you are a first-time user, please Subscribe to select a plan that meets your needs, and create an account to view premium content such as this article.
BY KYLE MARTIN Daily Post Staff Writer Palo Alto City Council is expected to approve a new grocery store on El Camino Real in the College Terrace neighborhood where two […]
BY ALLISON LEVITSKY Daily Post Staff Writer The owners of the shuttered College Terrace Market in Palo Alto have been sued by their building’s real estate developer for $460,000 of […]
Just opened in Palo Alto, College Terrace Market is a complete neighborhood grocery store where you can enjoy housemade gourmet foods and local and artisanal products alongside the everyday name-brand […]
1 Comment
Fined by the city for not having a grocery store, what’s wrong with this picture? We’re living at a time when you can be fined for operating your business (“non-essential” business) or for not operating a business. How any of this is legal is beyond me. And please don’t tell me that the owners made a deal with the city under penalty of fines as a condition for receiving a business license, because that itself would be problematic for many reasons – unconstitutional condition, taking, due process of law, equal protection, etc.
Fined by the city for not having a grocery store, what’s wrong with this picture? We’re living at a time when you can be fined for operating your business (“non-essential” business) or for not operating a business. How any of this is legal is beyond me. And please don’t tell me that the owners made a deal with the city under penalty of fines as a condition for receiving a business license, because that itself would be problematic for many reasons – unconstitutional condition, taking, due process of law, equal protection, etc.