![Ron Galatolo](https://padailypost.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Ron-Galatolo.png)
A decision on whether former San Mateo County Community College District Chancellor Ron Galatolo will face charges from the District Attorney’s Office may come late next month, the DA said Dec. 10.
A decision on whether former San Mateo County Community College District Chancellor Ron Galatolo will face charges from the District Attorney’s Office may come late next month, the DA said Dec. 10.
Comments are closed.
© Copyright 2025, The Daily Post. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
::after
The Board’s Gambit
Was the San Mateo County Community College District (SMCCCD) Board of Trustees outplayed? They reached a settlement agreement removing long time Chancellor Ron Galatolo from his job in August 2019. The public was never informed why nor how this was beneficial to SMCCCD. The separation agreement specified the ouster was due to “disputes” in their employment relationship.
The agreement gave Mr. Galatolo a new employment contract as Chancellor Emeritus totaling $1.2 million until March of 2022. This was odd. Why would you rehire someone with whom you had “disputes”? This smelled like a quid pro quo.
Three days later, the District Attorney executed a search warrant investigating Galatolo. Then the Board placed Galatolo on paid administrative leave. The Board claimed this action was unrelated to the DA’s investigation, which after fifteen months should conclude soon.
If the DA clears Mr. Galatolo’s name, will the Board rescind their action and put the Chancellor Emeritus back to work?
Alternatively, as the Board claimed Galatolo’s administrative leave was unrelated to the DA’s investigation, one assumes the Board conducted their own internal inquiry of some issue. If Mr. Galatolo’s name is cleared internally, will he resume his responsibilities as Chancellor Emeritus?
Should damaging information be uncovered, Mr. Galatolo has the SMCCCD Board in check. In an unusual employment arrangement providing Galatolo job security, the Board is precluded from firing the Chancellor Emeritus. Only an outside arbitrator can terminate his Chancellor Emeritus contract “for cause” as Chancellor Emeritus; this clause holds him harmless for past infractions as Chancellor.
Check mate.